A dearth of data: fitting parasitoids into ecological networks

Parasitoids are key ecosystem service providers within sustainable agriculture and integrated pest-management strategies due to their function as biocontrol agents.There is a dearth of data regarding how parasitoids fit wider communities interacting species, but such information essential for the successful implementation conservation biological control in open-field agroecosystems.DNA barcoding useful tool establishment host–parasitoid interactions (and many other associations) can enable rapid relatively cost-effective construction ecological networks.Ecological networks, specifically multilayer networks constructed using DNA-based methods, significantly aid our understanding land management influence multiple services lead enhanced agricultural sustainability. Studying provide insights into global diversity estimates, climate change impacts, agroecosystem provision. However, this potential remains largely untapped lack on interact with organisms. Ecological studying exploiting impacts parasitoids, hindered by magnitude undescribed parasitoid sparse knowledge host ranges, an under-representation DNA-barcode databases (we estimate <5% have barcode). Here, we advocate use DNA metabarcoding construct component networks. While incorporation network-based analyses has far ranging applications, focus its assessing provision agroecosystems. Host–parasitoid dynamics been major evolutionary study since early 20th century role play communities, agents (Box 1). The economic value natural pest estimated be $4.5 billion annually USA alone [1.Losey J.E. Vaughn M. provided insects.Bioscience. 2006; 56: 311-323Crossref Scopus (1038) Google Scholar]. With recent bans insect pesticides, well prevalence insecticide resistance, usage likely increase near future [2.Shields M.W. et al.History, current situation challenges control.Biol. Control. 2019; 131: 25-35Crossref (40) Release pests closed systems, widespread Encarsia formosa greenhouse whitefly (Trialeurodes vaporariorum) [3.Bale J.S. al.Biological food production.Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2008; 363: 761-776Crossref PubMed (345) Scholar], standard practice, range species commercially available. Similarly, successfully used classical (see Glossary). Anagyrus lopezi spectacularly against cassava mealybug Africa, savings between US$8 US$20 over 40 years [4.Zeddies J. al.Economics Africa.Agric. Econ. 2001; 24: 209-219Crossref increasingly being discussed context (CBC) Scholar,3.Bale Scholar,5.115th Congress Agriculture Improvement Act 2018.https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/2Date: 2018Google research mostly concerns direct (Figure 1A ). Relatively little known about non-pest hosts (i.e., complete ranges), predators 1B,C) [6.Stiling P. Biological not target.Biol. Invasions. 2004; 6: 151-159Crossref (30) Scholar] occurring systems. There growing realisation that these ‘non-target’ utility via indirect effects, is, acting two mediated one or more additional 2) [7.Frost C.M. al.Apparent competition drives community-wide parasitism rates changes abundance across boundaries.Nat. Commun. 2016; 7: 12644Crossref (39) Scholar, 8.Cronin J.T. Shared metacommunity: Indirect inhibit herbivore membership local communities.Ecology. 2007; 88: 2977-2990Crossref (20) 9.Sanders D. van Veen F.J.F. commensalism promotes persistence secondary consumer species.Biol. Lett. 2012; 8: 960-963Crossref shown experimental field settings; example, Sanders (2012) found absence extinction another competitive exclusion [9.Sanders Cronin (2007) demonstrated impact another’s population shared [8.Cronin effect called ‘apparent competition’ which long hypothesised populations [10.Holt R.D. Bonsall M.B. Apparent competition.Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2017; 48: 447-471Crossref (123) Scholar].Box 1What parasitoids?Insect comprise large number defined larval feeding strategy – they feed exclusively arthropod host, almost leading death [23.Godfray H.C.J. Parasitoids: Behavioural Evolutionary Ecology.1st edn. Princeton University Press, 1994Crossref They orders Hymenoptera, Diptera, Strepsiptera, these, Hymenopteran best studied. vital importance [68.LaSalle Parasitic biodiversity.in: LaSalle Gauld I.D. Hymenoptera Biodiversity. CAB International, 1993: 197-215Google there mounting recognition pollination [69.Zemenick A.T. al.A network approach reveals wasps generalized nectar foragers.Arthropod Plant Interact. 13: 239-251Crossref (10) bioindicators health ecosystems [18.Anderson A. al.The grasslands.J. Appl. 2011; 382-390Crossref (41) Scholar].Insect display variety life-history obscure complexes. Askew Shaw (1986) [70.Askew R.R. M.R. Parasitoid communities: size, structure development.in: Waage Greathead Insect Parasitoids, 13th Symposium Royal Entomological Society London. Academic 1986: 225-264Google grouped types based upon whether killed paralysed during oviposition (idiobiosis) continue develop after (koinobiosis). Idiobiont often (though always) ectoparasitic, larvae do external it. These generally believed greater than koinobiont typically endoparasitic Further, primary parasitism, single directly attacks host; superparasitism, individuals same attack individual; multiparasitism, hyperparasitism, will larva nonparasitoid variations around each life histories [71.Quicke D.L.J. Braconid Ichneumonid Wasps: Biology, Systematics, Evolution Ecology. John Wiley, 2015Google Due complexity, fraught difficulties, molecular approaches overcome these.Figure 2The whole-ecosystem approach: effects habitat types.Show full caption(A) Example combining from plant–pollinator, plant–herbivore, herbivore–parasitoid four farmland landscape types: woodland, hedgerow, grassland, crops. (B–D) progression considered (direct) crop plant (B), (indirect) (C), tertiary (D). (E–G) removing non-crop habitats interactions: hedgerow (E), woodland (F), grassland (G). Considering whole plants ‘hidden’ interactions.View Large Image Figure ViewerDownload Hi-res image Download (PPT) these. (A) interactions. rise development application past decades indicative analysing complex questions ecology evolution [11.Delmas E. al.Analysing interactions.Biol. 94: 16-36Crossref (170) Their systems valuable anthropogenic drivers beyond modification tropical forests [12.Tylianakis J.M. al.Habitat alters webs.Nature. 445: 202-205Crossref (619) arctic [13.Kankaanpää T. al.Parasitoids indicate climate-induced shifts communities.Glob. Chang. 2020; 26: 6276-6295Crossref But link habitats, could facilitate decision-making at both scales. reflect specificity frequency enables quantification trends, rates, like Scholar,11.Delmas Scholar,12.Tylianakis Scholar,14.Bohan D.A. Networking way better provision.Trends 31: 105-115Abstract Full Text PDF (49) paradigm shift holistic For knowing inform bolstered presence predict it might native through non-target if introduced agent [15.Henneman M.L. Memmott Infiltration Hawaiian community agents.Science. 293: 1314-1316Crossref (232) share us reduces overall [16.Cusumano al.Interspecific competition/facilitation among parasitoids.Curr. Opin. 14: 12-16Crossref no only benefit cropland unknown also help uncover [17.Grass I. al.Past fragmentation stability plant–pollinator networks.Nat. 2018; 2: 1408-1417Crossref (50) Scholar,18.Anderson conservation.Box 2Ecological networksEcological characterise occur coexisting predation, herbivory, pollination, I). deepen revealing strength nature connections This enhance ability anticipate mitigate environmental communities.Ecological context, nodes (species) connected links (interactions). simply represent interaction (qualitative networks) relative (quantitative networks). Link established association. That proportion individual parasitized given species. Networks comprising different traditionally studied independently, limits predictive ability. Because dependent all present time, ‘subnetworks’ of, ‘multiplex’ reveal relationship composition, toolbox drawn advances complexity science. communities. A deeper level therefore required before CBC fully incorporated viable (IPM). particular light contemporary policy directives promoting practices globally [5.115th Scholar,19.European Union Directive 2009/128/EC European Parliament Council 21 October 2009.Establishing Framework Community Action Achieve Sustainable Use Pesticides. 2009Google 3) reduce time cost constructing aiding identification enabling trophic [20.Kitson J.J.N. al.Detecting invasive Lepidopteran nested tagging metabarcoding.Mol. 28: 471-483Crossref (37) It bias traditional rearing characterisation difficult-to-observe [21.Wirta H.K. al.Complementary perception web structure.Proc. Natl. Acad. U. S. 2014; 111: 1885-1890Crossref (99) new high-throughput sequencing approaches, plus increased availability reduced tools progresses, continuing grow [22.Evans D.M. Kitson J.N. Molecular plant–insect interactions.Curr. 38: 26-33Crossref Yet, taxonomy lessened poor representation barcode repositories diversity.Box 3DNA (meta)barcodingDNA barcoding, genetic ‘barcode’ identify popular globe [72.Valentini al.DNA ecologists.Trends 2009; 110-117Abstract (690) In metazoa, usually 658 bp length COI gene dubbed 'the Folmer region' [73.Folmer O. primers amplification mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I diverse metazoan invertebrates.Mol. Mar. Biotechnol. 1994; 3: 294-299PubMed Taxonomic classification sequences involves comparison reference database containing locus derived morphologically identified specimens. most commonly Barcode Life (BOLD) [31.Ratnasingham Hebert P.D.N. system.Mol. Notes. 355-364Crossref (4168) order confidently describe comparability sampling efforts parts globe, international BOLD need populated described species.Metabarcoding common biomonitoring determining composition samples [74.Hebert al.Counting animal barcodes: Canadian insects.Phil. B. 37120150333Crossref (183) parallel subsequent barcodes organisms simultaneously rapidly approximate richness mixed sample. Unlike classically utilises Sanger generate changing [75.Srivathsan MinIONTM-based pipeline fast barcoding.Mol. Resour. 18: 1035-1049Crossref (52) Scholar]), requires platforms Illumina®, Pacific Biosciences®, Oxford Nanopore Technologies®.While region length, maximum sequence generated by, Illumina sequencing, realistically 550 when taking account read overlap quality control. Since too sequenced, studies utilise mini-barcodes vary 130 500 [76.Elbrecht V. Leese F. Validation freshwater macroinvertebrate bioassessment.Front. Environ. 5: 11Google should noted means much information, resolve differences [77.Meusnier universal mini-barcode biodiversity analysis.BMC Genom. 9: 214Crossref (448) Scholar].Once generated, similar clustered OTUs, filtered create amplicon variants (ASVs) [78.Callahan B.J. al.Exact replace operational taxonomic units marker-gene analysis.ISME 11: 2639-2643Crossref (1089) linked assigned identity [79.Altschul S.F. al.Basic alignment search tool.J. Mol. 1990; 215: 403-410Crossref (67299) algorithms exist purpose reducing noise, present, efficacy varies depending assemblages. some clustering rely percentage similarity arbitrary cut off, inaccuracies assemblage descriptions. (meta)barcoding and, cases, option Metabarcoding